Russell, Wilson And The Standard View Of Science

Religion and perception ConnectionRussell and Wilson s Views on the Relation between information and ReligionThe `Standard` Understanding of the Relation of Religion to eruditionBertrand Russell , Religion and Science (Chapters I-VHow is scientific investigation different from ghostlike thoughtRELIGION and science ar more or less(prenominal)times assumed mortal enemies . To some they appear locked in a struggle of such magnitude that it may be that ane will triumph only by the shoemakers last of the a nonher(prenominal) . In one camp are some scientists , such as chemist Peter Atkins , who feel that harmonise pietism and science is impossible Atkins says that to believe that God is an business relationship (of anything , allow alone everything ) is intellectually contemptible (as quoted by Russell , 45 ) In a nonhe r camp are ghostly good love who blame science for the destruction of faith . Such individuals create to the opinion that science as practiced today is a deception its facts may be correct , but the misapprehension of those facts undermines the beliefs of the faithful For instance , there are those who believe that no ultimate foundation for ethics no ultimate bone marrow for alivenessspan could actually amount to the measures of morality that is outlined on the pages of the Bible which is further known as the Bible . unless , some of the conflict has developed because of false or not incontrovertible assertions originating from both sides . For centuries , religious leaders have taught mythic legends and senseless dogmas that are at odds with modern scientific findings and not based on inspired Scripture . For fashion object lesson , the Roman Catholic Church condemned Galileo because he concluded , right , that the earth revolves around the sun . Galileo s vie w in no way contradicted the Bible , but it ! was contrary to what the church taught at the time . On the other hand , scientists are at fault when they teach as fact the `not-provable conjecture that life sentence evolved from inanimate matter independent of God . They ridicule religious faith as unscientific .

Is it possible , then , to know science and piety ? Yes , it is . Actually proven science and true religion complement rather than contradict each other . BOTH science and religion , in their noblest forms , involve the research for truth . Science discovers a universe of magnificent , a universe that contains distinctive marks of intelligent design . true(p) religion makes these discoveries meaningful by teaching that the mind of the spring lies bottom of the inning the design manifest in the physical world . I find my appreciation of science is greatly enriched by religion says Francis Collins , a molecular biologist (Russell , 34 . He continues When I discover something about the human genome , I follow through a sense of awe at the secret of life , and say to myself , `Wow , only God knew in the basic place It is a profoundly beautiful and moving sensation , which helps me evaluate God and makes science even more honour for me (Russel , 34 ) Among the basic concerns of both science and religion is the theory concerning uranology as well as to how the universe came frontward . It could be noticed how different both sides are upon...If you necessity to spring up a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay