Net Force and Time Variables

The question at hand was how the send away commit of an intention is changed during a buzz off on in an lift. This will be shown by a crystalize line versus time graph.\n\n guesswork\nGiven that the interlock forte of an object is a exercise of the plenteousness quantityd and the measure acceleration, we know that when the acceleration changes the net forte follows suit. I figure that as the aerodynamic lift moves up, the objects crowd unitedly will increase and as the elevator travels to lower levels, the objects majority will decrease.\n\nRationale\nNewtons sec Law (simplified) states that force is tinge to batch multiplied by acceleration. For an elevator to check at rest, it must support its own lading on with the objects within. This changes for an elevator travelling in the up direction. Lets say all together they contain a grass of 10 kg. To find their mass we must multiply the mass by the numerical note value for gravity (well use 9.8). This equals protrude to 98 Newtons that the elevator cables matter away to be able to support. If the elevator needs to move up to a different traumatize with an acceleration of 5m/s/s, the net force now has an superfluous 50 Newtons. These new 50 Newtons are just the force needed to accelerate the mass. \nTherefore, to get the total force, we must render the two forces (force needed to stay in place and force needed to accelerate the mass), adding up to 148 Newtons. The 98 Newton object now has an apparent weight of 148 Newtons (Nave, R. (1998, ). HyperPhysics. face lifting Problem. Retrieved December 9, 2013, from http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/elev.html). When the elevator is woful downwards, the acceleration becomes negative. If we take the same scenario from above and supersede 5m/s/s with -5m/s/s, the apparent weight is slightly 48 Newtons. This shows that when moving upwards in an elevator, you feel heavier and when moving down, you feel lighter (Stanbrough, J. The Elevator Problem) \n\nMethods\nProcedure\nFirstly, we collected our materials that were...